Design Partners
Shape a scoped on-prem review pilot with us
InvarLock OSS is public and usable now. This page is for model risk, validation, governance, and ML platform teams that want to work with us on the private on-prem review/control-plane layer around that evidence flow before the commercial package is finalized.
Best fit right now
Best fit right now
- You already review model edits before release and need stronger evidence around those decisions.
- You have a named owner for model approval, validation, or governance.
- Private or on-prem constraints materially affect how the review workflow must be deployed.
- You are comfortable shaping the pilot before final packaging is locked down.
Pilot
What a pilot looks like
This is a scoped engagement around one real release-review workflow, not a platform-wide rollout or a finished SKU handoff.
Pilot shape
- One real review workflow, not a platform-wide rollout.
- Direct work on deployment shape, evidence handoff, approval flow, and operator support.
- A paid, scoped engagement with explicit success criteria.
- A clear decision at the end: keep using OSS only, continue the pilot, or move into a broader commercial deployment.
Confirm fit
We start with your current review process, named approval owner, deployment constraints, and whether a design-partner conversation is the right path.
Scope one workflow
We map one real release-review workflow, including deployment shape, evidence handoff, approval flow, and operator support.
Define the decision
We set explicit success criteria and a clear end state: stay on OSS only, continue the pilot, or move toward a broader commercial deployment.
Current state
What exists today
- The public OSS engine, docs, GitHub repo, reports, verification flow, and evidence-pack workflows.
- A direct path to evaluate model changes now without a pricing gate or sales process.
- A public OSS engine that design partners can pressure-test against real deployment and review constraints.
Refinement
What design partners help refine
- The private on-prem review/control-plane layer that sits around the OSS engine.
- How deployment, upgrades, evidence review, and handoff should work in practice.
- What support and consulting should look like around the likely core on-prem offering.
Compatibility
Compatibility and stability
The design-partner path stays anchored to the public OSS evidence flow. The goal is to document how the private layer fits around it, not to replace the underlying artifact contract.
- The OSS engine remains public and usable throughout the engagement.
- The private layer is built around the existing evidence flow rather than replacing it.
- Evaluation report compatibility and upgrade expectations are documented explicitly for design partners before rollout.
Fit
Best fit
This path is for teams that already have a real review problem and want to shape the on-prem workflow around it, rather than waiting for a finished package list.
- Teams already reviewing quantization, merges, pruning, fine-tuning, or other model edits before release.
- Organizations with a named owner for model approval, validation, or governance.
- Teams with private or on-prem constraints that materially affect deployment shape.
- Teams that want evidence for model changes, not just benchmark dashboards.
Not a fit
If one of these is true, the public OSS path or a later commercial conversation is probably the better route.
- You only want a public OSS quickstart with no partner discussion.
- You need a fully packaged commercial offer immediately.
- You are evaluating vendors only through finalized pricing and SKU comparisons.
Next step
Next step
If this sounds like the right fit, start with a direct conversation about your release-review workflow. If not, the OSS engine, docs, and evidence examples are already available now.