Self-edit evidence, backend compatibility, and larger model lanes
InvarLock 0.12.0 adds knowledge/self-edit workflow metadata, widens BYOE edit-lane evidence, and reorganizes public evidence around backend compatibility and larger model findings.
Release: InvarLock 0.12.0 - Self-edit workflow evidence, backend compatibility, and larger-model public basis
Highlights
- Knowledge-edit and self-edit workflows now have a documented evidence shape: external editor, subject checkpoint or declared runtime artifact, baseline-vs-subject evaluation, verification, and optional evidence pack.
- BYOE edit evidence is broader, with LoRA merge, full fine-tune, and magnitude-prune lanes plus training evidence campaign artifacts, checkpoint references, runtime manifests, verification summaries, and hash inventories.
- Public evidence is organized around clearer categories for runtime backend compatibility, attention-backend behavior, lifecycle stress/resume evidence, larger-model validation findings, and published-basis model lanes.
0.12.0 is about widening what can be reviewed without blurring the claim boundary. InvarLock still verifies a configured baseline-vs-subject comparison. The new Knowledge & self-edit workflows guide explains how to carry context for knowledge edits, self-adaptation loops, LoRA merges, fine-tunes, pruning, quantization, dynamic runtime adapters, and privacy-sensitive deltas without turning those labels into hidden strict gates.
That guide introduces optional metadata for evaluation realism, edit provenance, edit-impact scenarios, topology, and delta privacy. The important constraint is explicit: fields such as edit_family, target_set_digest, metric_is_generation_realistic, proxy_metric_warning, artifact_kind, and delta_privacy help readers understand the subject artifact, while the verifier verdict remains tied to the selected report and runtime-provenance contract.
The public evidence surface also grows. The Public Evidence Walkthrough now includes separate BYOE examples for magnitude pruning, LoRA merge, and fine-tune subjects. Evidence Packs and Evidence Pack Internals describe the validation-subject taxonomy, tuned clean edits, stress edits, deployable edit lanes, stricter release-review packaging, queue reliability controls, and package-native verification behavior.
Model and backend coverage get a clearer map as well. The synced Model Family Catalog and Model Adapters include updated published-basis distinctions for Gemma, Qwen, GPT-OSS, Phi, Falcon, OpenLLaMA, and related lanes. The upstream release also records CUDA 12.8 runtime backend compatibility evidence for bitsandbytes, GPTQModel, HQQ, Quanto, TorchAO, and compressed-tensors, plus attention-backend evidence for FA2-unavailable eager execution.
Sources
Website documentation explains the maintained workflow. The changes described here belong to InvarLock v0.12.0; the tagged release record preserves that historical scope.
More in Release
Explore nearby related posts.
Release
Guard-value contracts and stock-clean attention control
InvarLock 0.12.1 tightens the Mistral guard-value evidence contract, promotes targeted spectral/RMT/VE probes to required detections, and replaces the attention control with a stock-cap-clean 1.05x lane.
Release
Report outlines, guard warnings, and wider public evidence
InvarLock 0.11.0 makes human reports more consistent, separates guard warnings from hard failures, and expands the public evidence surface across model families.
Release note
InvarLock 0.13.0: One Request, One Signed Decision Trail
One YAML request now binds artifacts, schedule, metric, and policy. One signed evidence pack carries that comparison through independent verification and reporting.